Hi my name is Jean Pierre Nortje an unfortunately toxic white South African male.

My Pronouns are He – Him

It is come to my attention that there was recent publicity about my actions in a property transaction.
For whatever reason the publisher painted a less than complementary picture about me.

The rendition of the story contained blatant lies and distortions of the facts and was clearly a character assassination attempt.

Anybody who thinks that fair justice and defamation redress can easily be found in South African Court is also living under a rock.

I will therefore hereby record the actual facts of the matter on this website.

In November of 2019 a client approached me as an estate agent to sell a property in Sea Point Cape Town.
This young lady, living in the UK, inherited a property from her father who told her is worth at least 5 million.
I inspected the property together with her, their family family lawyer and architect.
We found the property in an extreme state of disrepair with illegal occupants, effectively squatters, occupying it.

As I was both an estate agent and a builder are offered to renovate the property for the owner before selling it but she too chose to sell it as is.
The owner then signed a mandate for me to sell the property and I proceeded to advertise it for a number of months but nobody was interested in buying it because of the state of the property and I could not even get offers of R3m to commit.

In March 2020 I facilit an agreement whereby an investor would have the right to repair and renovate the property before taking transfer in order for it to be eligible for a bond.

The owner / seller agreed to these terms and entered into an agreement of sale AOS with a company as the purchasing entity.

The agreement of sale AOS clearly stated that the purchaser will have beneficial occupation to perform repairs and renovations R&R before taking transfer of the property.

As stated before I am also in the business of repairs and renovations and just as I had offered my services to the seller to perform these services, I also offered the same services to the purchaser which was accepted and I was appointed as the contractor to do the R&R work.

I was there for the estate agent that facilitated the agreement and after this was appoint as a contractor to do the repairs and renovations.

I was specifically not the purchaser or party to the agreement of sale

The seller was unable for most of 2020 to get rid of the illegal occupants and therefore unable to give vacant occupation to the purchaser / the contractor to proceed with the R & R project.
During 2020 Covid 19 severely slowed down the project and I also ended up in hospital with long term covid further inhibiting the progress of the project.

Despite drawbacks The house was effectively rebuilt and I’ve spent some 3.5 million Rand in doing so.

My terms with the purchaser was the R&R costs would be paid on transfer and I was there for performing this work on risk.

The purchase is only security was the agreement of sale and Miami security was my R&R agreement with the purchaser and Retention rights on the property until the contract had been settled.

The purchaser a furthermore pledged the AOS as surety for the R and R contract.

And the seller became frustrated with the slow progress of the project even though at least the first year was of her own making I had no control over the fact that covert became a factor.

However she then got involved with a lawyer which advisor that she should try and cancel the contract the AOS they were myself and the purchaser with empty hands

Years of litigation followed and the lawyer was able to convince the court that the agreement of sales should be set aside including the builderts lien.

Per the state of affairs was obviously undeniable as myself and the butcher so we’re now out of pocket by more than 3 and 1/2 million Rand and we appeal to the Supreme Court to address this mascara of justice.

It was however only when I petitioned President of the Supreme Court outlining the egregious and erroneous precedents that were set by this ruling that the penny dropped.

Are the president of the Supreme Court referred the matter to 5 bench appeal Quote Much to the chagrin of the court who promptly decided to do just the opposite.

The appeal court case was conducted as a virtual hearing which was not recorded and instead of five judges I was only able to see and hear and they were certainly not 5 and I was not given an opportunity to state my case but was merely peppered by the one judge present with the Opposition’s allegations which consisted of more than one hour of being asked where my FFC was, completely ignoring the state of the law in South Africa regarding FFCS.

Now the court was therefore not properly constituted and the subsequent judgment was written by a judge who wasn’t even present.

I recorded my objection to this to the Registrar of the Supreme Court and was informed that I would have to refer the matter to the Constitutional Court if I was unhappy which I did

The judgment consisted once again purely of the opposition’s allegations ignoring all my proven facts to the contrary on record and the legal presidents that were highlighted by the judgeprsident in her referralpre referral and the character assassination attempt by the fake media was on this judgment without ever mentioning the fact that all this is now before the Constitutional Court as at least eight major judicial flaws are setting dangerous constitutional presidents

The High Court allowed evidence tampering, applied court rules one sidedly, did not read or comprehend the court record and simply parroted the lies and deception of the extremely underhanded opposing legal team.

I deal with each cornerstone of this miscarriage of justice plus all the evidence that was before the court and ignored per website page under the following subject headings.

MY STATUS AS ESTATE AGENT

THE AOS TERMS AND CONDITIONS

THE R&R AGREEMENT

THE SCOPE OF THE PROJECT

THE BUILDERS LIEN

THE BEFORE AND AFTER STATE OF THE PROPERTY

THE CORRESPONDENCE PROOF OF SELLERS KNOWLEDGE AND APPROVAL

THE PRINCIPLE OF ESTOPPEL

THE RULE OF MISREPRESENTATION

THE HIGH COURT FIASCO

THE JUDGE PRESIDENT OF THE SUPREME COURT

THE APPEAL COURT FIASCO

THE CONSTITUTUTIONAL COURT FACTS

I will Furthermore outline the number of projects that I have invested in over the years and how each one of them was torpedoed by the same actors behind this media group causing me losses in excess of R100m, effectively losing everything I’ve ever owned.

So in the end you can judge for yourself who the bad guys are in this movie.

I also know there are thousands of SA entrepreneurs who was squashed by these same actors so maybe we should form a club called “fucked by you know who”

I will publish your stories and maybe we can form a resistance group.

Contact me by all means.

The plethora of lies perpetuated by the opposition lawyers, parroted and further twisted by the media include inter alia the allegations that:

I was not an estate agent at the time Of the property transaction

This constituted material misrepresentation

The property was in a good condition and was worth more than 5 million Rand

Other than the Of that the was unaware of the condition of the property

That the Property to be sold

That the owner of the property was an elderly lady

That the parties to the purchase agreement were not clearly identified in the agreement of sale

That I was party to the agreement of sale

That the owner did not know but I was refurbishing and repairing the property

That the owner was unaware of the scope of work being done

That the seller was unhappy well the work I was doing.

That a contractor does not have retention rights on a property untile he is paid for his work.